Otherwise, try the following troubleshooting steps: How shameful.If this is your first time using WebLink, refer to the the Quick Start Guide. 90% of the times, sequels are signs of imminent scarcity in creativity. I blame Pixar greatly because it hasn't been listening to the suggestions (let's not call them "demands") of fans: if there must be a sequel, it must be The Incredibles 2, not Cars 2, not Finding Dory, not Monsters University, no Toy Story 3 (an overrated sentimental mess). This had no nostalgic quality, no logic in its continuity, no comprehensible character connections. What's the use? What's the logic behind such decision? In what book is it stated that making a film with thought-provoking reflections, either metaphysical, earthly or heartwarming, and continuing it with a "comedic" international espionage twist is supposed to contribute ANYTHING to the story? I would only justify such attempt with independent or renowned filmmakers, as was the case of Hal Hartley, but we are talking about Pixar here, a company focused at making trascendental 3D-animated films aimed at all types of audiences. And it suffers from exactly the same f***ing syndrome: an illusion of international espionage parody. I saw Cars 2 for the first time exactly one week after watching Hal Hartley's sequel to Henry Fool, called Fay Grim. What a bizarre turn of bizarre events that came straight out from Bizarro world. Jesus Christ, it reminds me of Fay Grim (2006).
0 kommentar(er)
